The Ocean Innovation Playbook: A Guide to Building and Scaling Blue Economy Ecosystems

This article is part of my series on "The Next Economy: Business, Energy & Sustainability in Transition"

Solutions Abound, Where are the Customers?

Globally, a growing number of blue economy (ocean-related) meetings bring together public and private sector actors, scientists, NGOs, and other stakeholders to create a prosperous and sustainable ocean economy. Technology and innovation sit at the heart of that vision, offering exciting new ways to tackle ocean problems, and create business value through sustainable use of the ocean. In one corner of the event hall, a seasoned entrepreneur explains how her kelp-based polymer could replace billions of single-use plastic containers. Across the room, a graduate student's eyes light up as he describes his robotic glider streaming real-time ocean data to scientists thousands of miles away. But look around for the buyers who could sign purchase orders or the investors who could write scaling checks. They're usually nowhere to be found.

This isn't about lack of passion or brilliant ideas—it's about structure. The ocean economy already generates roughly US$2.6 trillion a year, and could double by 2050, according to OECD estimates.[1] Pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, and insurers collectively control about US$100 trillion, but disclosed “blue” mandates account for only US$69 billion – less than one-tenth of one percent. Impact-investing assets have passed US$1.5 trillion, yet ocean-related deals attract less than US$16 billion.[2] The result is a chronic “commons discount.” Ventures that restore reefs or cut underwater noise deliver public benefit first and revenue later, leaving traditional capital on the sidelines.

Catalyst organizations—accelerators, incubators, cluster managers, test-site operators—have grown rapidly to fill this void. Their success stories are impressive: autonomous hull-cleaners in Boston, floating wind arrays in Norway, regenerative seaweed cultivation and bio-refineries in the Philippines. Yet most promising prototypes still take years to secure their first commercial contract, and many don't survive that journey.

Figure 1. Seaweed farming. Arenas Reef, Philippines. © Jürgen Freund / WWF

To understand how to shorten this timeline, we need to look beyond ocean-specific ventures to six frontier sectors that have already cracked similar puzzles: climate tech, biotechnology, commercial space, water treatment, agricultural technology, and regional hydrogen hubs.

Climate technology: regulation as a demand engine

To understand how to shorten this timeline, we need to look beyond ocean-specific ventures to six frontier sectors that have already cracked similar puzzles: climate tech, biotechnology, commercial space, water treatment, agricultural technology, and regional hydrogen hubs.

Germany's feed-in tariffs guaranteed renewable energy producers a purchase price for two decades, turning kilowatts into bankable assets. In the US, corporate power-purchase agreements evolved from novelty to trillion-dollar instrument, locking in twenty-year revenue streams before construction began. Policy created the revenue floor, corporate contracts built the walls, and layered financing capped the roof.

Blue ventures face similar obstacles—uncertain regulations, risk-averse buyers, scarce growth capital. The script is there to copy. Recent coastal flood standards are encouraging insurers to treat reef restoration as deductible risk reduction. Proposed low-carbon fuel mandates for shipping could do for green methanol what renewable portfolio standards did for solar. Once regulation creates a market, familiar capital providers follow.

Biotechnology: wet-lab efficiency and intellectual-property clarity

Boston-Cambridge leads biotech innovation by perfecting three ingredients: subsidized bench space, transparent ownership rules, and deep pools of sector-savvy investment.

The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980[3] removed a crucial ambiguity by letting universities keep patent rights to federally funded discoveries. This created a transfer mechanism that venture capital could understand and underwrite, unleashing waves of innovation and funding.

Ocean biotechnology faces similar wet-lab costs. Cultured seaweed strains, plastic-eating enzymes, and fish health probiotics all need controlled chambers, seawater intake, and skilled technicians. When research institutes co-locate startup desks with water-intensive labs, entrepreneurs avoid the million-dollar instrumentation costs that often kill momentum.

Cambridge's LabCentral[4], which rents benches monthly, cut early-stage burn rates by up to 70% and attracted waves of follow-on capital. The same wet-lab efficiency could accelerate generations of ocean ventures.

Space economy: milestone contracts as lifelines

Hardware development is brutal. SpaceX's first Falcon 1 rocket failed to reach orbit three times and nearly bankrupted the company. Survival came through a milestone-based NASA agreement that paid for progress rather than final delivery.

Figure 2. The Falcon 1 rocket at take-off. Image: SpaceX/Thom Rogers.

Under NASA's Commercial Orbital Transportation Services program[5], funding flowed when SpaceX hit technical waypoints—engine tests, static fires, orbital insertion—rather than at final handoff. This aligned incentives perfectly: NASA de-risked its resupply mission faster, and SpaceX covered payroll without surrendering equity.

Oceans have their own big-ticket public customers. Navies need low-emission patrol craft, port authorities want digitized berth allocation, coast guards require wide-area pollution surveillance. When these agencies commit to milestone-based purchases, blue ventures get lifelines comparable to those that kept early space companies afloat.

Water technology: turning public goods into utility budgets

PFAS—the "forever chemicals"—represent today's equivalent of unpriced environmental damage. When the EPA set national drinking water limits in 2024[6], it pushed thousands of utilities to install treatment systems at an estimated capital cost exceeding $37 billion and annual operating costs as high as $3.5 billion.

The regulation converted a diffuse social hazard into a municipal budget line item, creating room for startups marketing resin filters, plasma oxidation, and advanced sorbents. Investors followed because clear regulations translated public benefit into private revenue.

Many ocean services play the same public-good role—shoreline protection, reef maintenance, kelp carbon sequestration. When coastal flood insurance premiums or municipal storm-drain budgets internalize these costs, new buyer categories emerge. A reef insurance product in Mexico's Quintana Roo already ties hotel tax revenue to storm protection delivered by healthy corals. The parallel is straightforward: rules or taxes make environmental externalities financially visible, and innovators respond.

Ag- and food technology: managing biological risk and fragmented demand

Agricultural technology grew up amid volatile weather, thin margins, and millions of small-to-medium customers. The tools that succeeded—precision fertilizer applicators, yield-monitoring drones, biological pest controls—won by linking directly to farm economics. A drought-resistant seed paid for itself through higher yields; an autonomous tractor justified its cost by cutting labor. Sustainability arguments played supporting roles at best.

Ocean food enterprises face the same imperative. Salmon farmers track feed-conversion ratios to the decimal. Coastal seaweed growers watch biomass per meter, not abstract sustainability narratives. Ventures promising to clean seabed waste or prevent sea-lice outbreaks attract attention only when they eliminate measurable expenses.

Blue catalysts can help founders translate habitat impact into cost savings—a lesson the ag-tech sector learned through a decade of trial and error.

Hydrogen hubs: place-based industrial strategy

In 2022, the US Department of Energy announced $7 billion for regional clean-hydrogen hubs[7], tying production, pipelines, offtake agreements, and workforce development to specific geographies. The program ensures public grants seed private investment only where demand is demonstrably close. Five hubs received initial awards in 2024 and immediately drew industrial consortia from steelmakers to long-haul trucking fleets.

Coastal regions are natural fits for similar thinking. A deep-water port can host wind-powered hydrogen production, bunkering services for green-ammonia ships, and seawater-cooled data centers. Bundling these assets within defined zones lets public capital, concessionary donors, and private equity pull in the same direction.

Norway's Ocean Autonomy Cluster in Trondheim operates on this principle. Local authorities, shipyards, and research institutes co-own a deep-water test range that any venture can book, reducing duplication and de-risking investment.

Pillars of a sustainable-innovation playbook

What unites the six analogue sectors is not technology but architecture. Scale appears when policy or anchor contracts supply predictable revenue; when layered capital relays a venture from grant to seed to equity to project finance; and when shared testbeds fast-track iterations. Ocean catalysts can adopt the same architecture, while recognizing one extra variable: the ocean is a perpetual commons. Accountability shrinks when jurisdiction is vague, which is why programs must bind beneficiaries—shipping lines, seafood majors, insurers—to ventures as early as possible.

Catalyst Hubs in Practice

This architecture already operates in five coastal hubs whose different approaches illuminate the full model. Together, they form an innovation ecosystem[8] where prototypes, investors, and policy ideas cross-pollinate.

Oslo, Norway – Venture Capital that Moves First and Measures Impact

Katapult Ocean flips the usual accelerator script by investing on day one. Since 2018, the fund has taken stakes in 77 ocean-impact companies across 25 countries and runs a three-month “dry-dock” sprint in Oslo where every cohort firm must shift both revenue and SDG-14 metrics[9] before demo day. It adds a missing piece to the puzzle: risk capital disciplined to publish a dual dashboard, one column for IRR, the other for tons of carbon or plastic avoided.

Reykjavík, Iceland – The ‘100% Fish’ Circularity Lab

The Iceland Ocean Cluster began as a single quayside warehouse and now houses 110 companies that pursue a simple mantra: use 100% of every fish.[10] Collagen for medical dressings comes from skins, enzymes for cosmetics from viscera, pet treats from heads and frames. Cod once worth US $4 as fillet now yields ten times that value in co-products, all within walking distance of the filleting room. Start-ups formed inside the “Fish House” have spun into Alaska and New England clusters, showing how a tight circular-economy story can leap borders and seed copy-cat hubs.

Figure 2. Iceland Ocean Cluster’s 100% Fish Strategy

Boston, Massachusetts – Turning a Working Port into a Living Laboratory

SeaAhead’s BlueSwell program persuaded the Port of Boston and the New England Aquarium to treat an active container pier as shared R&D infrastructure. Founders bolt hull-cleaning robots to tugboats at dawn, hand fresh data to NOAA staff at lunch, and pitch vessel operators before day-end. Five cohorts have launched 31 start-ups; 80% are still trading, together raising more than US $49 million while adding over 130 jobs. The lesson is velocity: when public agencies waive berth fees and regulators watch pilots in real time, the path from prototype to revenue closes by months.

Seattle, Washington – Policy as Market-Maker and Equity Engine

Washington Maritime Blue began not as a tech incubator but as a clause in state legislation linking port electrification to a maritime “innovation and workforce plan.” The Port of Seattle now co-runs an accelerator, commits to procure zero-carbon shore power when cost parity appears, and funds a Youth Maritime Collaborative that channels under-represented high-school students into paid waterfront internships. Seattle shows how policy pull, social-equity mandates, and anchor demand can move in lockstep—an American echo of the regulation-driven leaps that accelerated European climate tech.

Los Angeles, California – A Scale Campus on Reclaimed Wharfage

At AltaSea, thirty-five acres of derelict warehouses have become a multi-tenant blue-tech city. Wave-energy company Eco Wave Power can roll a full-scale converter down the same ramp that once loaded freighters, while a seaweed-plastic start-up runs cryogenic dryers next door. More than 40 businesses share cranes, quays, and data pipes with UCLA and USC researchers. The campus proves that hardware-heavy ventures thrive when big-footprint infrastructure is treated as public-benefit real estate rather than speculative property.

Weaving the pieces together

Boston supplies the live test-bed, Seattle the policy fuse, Los Angeles the scaling acreage, Oslo the venture discipline, and Reykjavík the circular-value narrative. None alone is sufficient; together they illustrate how a distributed ecosystem can pass a venture from proof-of-concept in one port to Series A funding in another and finally to industrial-scale production in a third.

Building the ocean blueprint

Link mission to market: Analysts at the World Economic Forum report that large investors still doubt the existence of “bankable” blue pipelines. The doubt fades when ventures present a dual metric: tons of reef substrate restored and dollars saved on hurricane insurance; kilograms of nitrogen captured and hours of port downtime avoided. Accelerator coaches should drill this discipline into every pitch, not as a concession to profiteering but as the only route to durability.

Align the finance waterfall: DNV modeling, showcased in The Ocean’s Future to 2050 report[11], shows future blue-economy capital expenditure growing more slowly than global GDP, largely because wind and aquaculture gains will not fully offset declining hydrocarbon investment. Blended finance fills the gap. A philanthropic or public first-loss layer can triple the volume of private money, as the Global Fund for Coral Reefs[12] demonstrates through its paired grant and equity vehicles. Program managers should publish a “waterfall” for each cohort: how much non-dilutive capital covers ideation, how much impact-first equity funds pilots, where mainstream venture fits, and which infrastructure lenders refinance assets at maturity.

Treat testbeds as civic infrastructure: Wet-lab fermenters at Woods Hole, Massachusetts, floating wind platforms in Stavanger, Norway and living-reef nurseries in Queensland, Australia all function as laboratories, but they also act as magnets for talent and investment. When local authorities view such sites as civic infrastructure—eligible for tax-credit bonds or port-authority leases—their maintenance budgets no longer depend on year-to-year grants. The payoff is shorter time to validated data, the currency investors trust most.

Bridge the commons gap with anchor purchasers: NASA did not merely observe space start-ups; it bought launch services from them. Port authorities can do the same for seabed-mapping or zero-carbon shore power. Municipal storm-drain agencies can contract plastic-capture services. Coastal tourism boards can insure reefs. Early memoranda of understanding give founders negotiating leverage and reassure financiers that demand is real. The 1000 Oceans Startup coalition[13], which now counts more than 550 ventures valued at US $12 bn, notes that its most successful alumni secured corporate or public contracts within eighteen months of program exit.

Use placed-based system approaches: Consider Boston’s SeaAhead BlueSwell program.[14] The port authority provides seawater intake, vessel slips and regulator access; Massachusetts environmental agencies fast-track testing permits; corporate sponsors include a cruise line eager to lower hull-cleaning costs. Participating start-ups reach pilot stage in roughly twelve months, half the U.S. average for ocean hardware.

Across the Atlantic, Norway’s Ocean Autonomy Cluster unites shipyards, robotics firms, the Norwegian University of Science and Technology and municipal harbor masters. A shared deep-water test range allows autonomous craft to log hundreds of hours under realistic conditions without negotiating multiple licenses. Within four years the range supported the world’s first two-hundred-megawatt floating wind-plus-storage project, financed by a consortium of utilities that had already booked its output.

These examples show that when local buyers, regulators and researchers share physical space, innovation cycles accelerate. They also show that the structure travels.

Measuring progress: Success should be visible in metrics that cannot be gamed by marketing polish. Median time from prototype to first paid deployment ought to drop from twenty-four months to twelve. The proportion of accelerator graduates with paying customers inside eighteen months should climb beyond fifty per cent. Capital labelled “blue,” now less than one tenth of one percent of institutional portfolios, needs to move toward one percent within this decade if DNV’s forecast growth in aquaculture, offshore wind and desalination is to materialize.

Impact metrics matter as well. The Coastal Risk Index[15] suggests that mangroves and coral reefs already prevent US $363 billion in flood damage each year; losing them would expose an additional 14 million people to annual flooding. Ventures that restore such ecosystems deserve credit at the scale of their avoided costs. Coupling ecological indicators with financial returns tightens the link between public value and private revenue, drawing in reluctant capital.

A closing note on velocity: Biotechnology reduced its cycle time by institutionalizing wet-lab sharing and patent clarity; climate technology did it by aligning policy with purchasing; commercial space by tying payment to progress; water technology by turning health risk into enforceable standards; ag-tech by mapping sustainability to farm economics; hydrogen hubs by clustering production and demand. None of these wins relied on a single breakthrough. They depended on architecture—how money, knowledge and demand were connected.

Ocean innovators now have the chance to use the same architectural grammar. If catalyst organizations weave regulation, finance, testbeds and anchor demand into a seamless path, prototypes will no longer age on the lab shelf. They will reach the water, prove their worth and earn repeat orders. The distance from idea to impact will shorten, and the ocean—for which time is running out—will gain a fighting chance.

The blueprint is not theoretical. Pieces of it already work in Boston, Trondheim, Singapore and Wellington. The task ahead is to scale those pockets of velocity into a global tide. When that tide turns, blue innovation will cease to be a niche spectacle at conferences and become an engine of economic and ecological renewal.

Exhibits

Exhibit 1. Global Directory of Ocean Catalyst Organizations

Below is a non-exhaustive list of key innovation catalysts active in the blue economy. These span hubs, clusters, accelerators, incubators, venture funds, research alliances, and coalitions.

Exhibit 2. Key Readings and References

Academic and Policy Literature:

• Autio, E. & Thomas, L. (2014). Innovation Ecosystems: Implications for Innovation Management? Oxford University Press.

• Mazzucato, M. (2018). The Entrepreneurial State. Penguin.

• OECD (2025). The Ocean Economy to 2050.

• High Level Panel for a Sustainable Ocean Economy. (2020). A Sustainable Ocean Economy for 2050.

• World Economic Forum/UpLink. The Ocean Impact Navigator.

• European Commission. (2021). BlueInvest Report: Investment Opportunities in the Blue Economy.

---

[1] OECD. (2025, March 31). The ocean economy to 2050. OECD Publishing.

[2] World Economic Forum, Ocean Risk and Resilience Action Alliance, Builders Vision, & Katapult Ocean. (2025). Making waves in the regenerative & sustainable ocean economy: Transformative ocean investment opportunities. World Economic Forum.

[3] United States Congress. (1980, December 12). Patent and Trademark Law Amendments Act (Bayh–Dole Act, Pub. L. No. 96-517, 94 Stat. 3015).

[4] LabCentral. (n.d.). Our impact. LabCentral. Retrieved July 6, 2025.

[5] National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (2006, May 30). Space Act Agreement for Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) (Agreement NNJ06TA26A). NASA.

[6] United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2024, April 9). PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation: General fact sheet. EPA.

[7] U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations. (n.d.). Regional Clean Hydrogen Hubs. U.S. Department of Energy. Retrieved July 6, 2025.

[8] Autio, E., & Thomas, L. D. W. (2014). Innovation ecosystems: Implications for innovation management? In M. Dodgson, D. M. Gann, & N. Phillips (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation management (pp. 204-228). Oxford University Press.

[9] United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2025, June). Global trade update: Sustainable ocean economy (DITC/INF/2025/4). UNCTAD.

[10] Iceland Ocean Cluster. (n.d.). 100 % Fish. Iceland Ocean Cluster. Retrieved July 6, 2025.

[11] DNV. (2023). Ocean’s future to 2050: A sectoral and regional forecast of the blue economy (Report No. 2023-V002). DNV Group Research & Development.

[12] Global Fund for Coral Reefs. (2024). GFCR coalition action for coral: 2024 in review.

[13] 1000 Ocean Startups. (2024). Annual gathering of the 1000 Ocean Startups coalition: Insights document 2024. World Economic Forum.

[14] SeaAhead. (2024, September 10). BlueSwell program selects fifth cohort of startup companies for ocean-innovation accelerator.

[15] Ocean Risk and Resilience Action Alliance. (2024, October). Coastal Risk Index: Data-platform launch highlights.